There is a massive list of reasons that a woman would refuse an offer for casual sex from a stranger in the street, all of which make much more sense than the one explanation that we were given in my social psych lecture: that women desire sex less than men do. As well as the reason listed above, the societal expectation that nice, good women merely put up with sex to satisfy their male partners, they do not enjoy it, much less actively seek it out (the expectation that is taught to them since birth), there is of course:
That women pass on casual sex from strange men DOES NOT logically signify a lesser sex drive, and I could not believe that it’s being taught as such. The sociocultural aspects seem so obvious, I could not believe they were completely overlooked in favour of it being read as clear ‘evidence’ of a natural biological disparity in the size of sex drives. Bullshit. This is what happens when social psych research exists in a vacuum, without input from, or even a moment’s consideration of other disciplines like anthropology or sociology or common sense.(via yourealightagainmydear)
Reblogging for great justice
Starting one tomorrow.
Never knowing where on scale that has luminaries such as Josh Homme, Shirley Manson, and High Overlord David Bowie - you are positioned.
I guess as long it is above Carrot Top aka Scott Thompson…
Bonus: Got some How To Destroy Angels, songs mid way through the set.
Because doing this on my own isn’t fun. Truth be told the result of having 1000s of people attempting to control the keyboard at once would probably be as good as I’m doing on my own - trying to be serious about it.